Beige & in Florence

Units of a Discipline

College disciplines overlap a lot. Imagine you want to answer the question "If there's a cold war with China will it would lead to nuclear war?" We would find papers written by historians, political scientists, sociologists, psychologists, and economists all addressing this same question. While there might be some hints of a turf war on the internet of who has the most correct framework for answering it. The fact that there is an open debate on which social science is best applied for this question is strong evidence that there's no consensus of who owns this space.

Questions on string theory clearly belong to physics, but it's less clear whether Fermi's paradox would better belong in the college of philosophy, physics or economics.

If disciplines don't have definitive boundaries on which questions they can answer, how do we know if someone's an economist? By simply looking at which memes or paradigms that guide their intuitions. Mapping out these memes would look like a principle components analysis if we ran a high level natural language process on academic papers.

Again these memes will only ever have a soft definition, but I will loosely define them as:

Here's my stab at a couple core memes from different fields

Economics/Game Theory

Statistics

Bayesian Statistics

Computer Science

Entrepreneurship

One's that I'm less confident on

Math

Physics

Philosophy

Molecular Biology

Evolutionary Biology

So unconfident that I'm basically making them up

Engineering

Arts/Film/Literature

Finance/Accounting

Design

History

Political Science

Chemistry

Disciplines that I couldn't even generate fake memes for

Sociology, English, Psychology, Medical School